Ask EngadgetHD: What is the difference between a HDTV and a monitor?

We have seen this questions a few times in the comments and it's time we addressed it. What is the difference between a computer monitor and an HDTV? While it is true that the line between the two is narrowing there is a difference.
There are two main differences, a tuner and the resolutions. (some may say 3 if you include the connections) In order to be considered a HDTV or a TV for that matter the display must include a tuner, traditionally this meant a NTSC tuner, but today ATSC tuners are also required on most TVs and soon all TVs will require a ATSC tuner to get the name TV.
Tuners aside there is still a distinct difference, between a computer display and a HDTV. When the PC just got started (or an Apple) you could use a TV as a monitor, but they quickly learned that interlaced tubes are terrible for reading text, so progressive scan displays became the norm, so along came VGA which has the same resolution as an SDTV; 640x480, but progressive. This obviously wasn't enough and NEC released the first multiscan display that supported multiple resolutions. (I am drastically simplifying this time line) Next came flat panel displays that were fixed pixels so they used scallers to emulate the multiscan functionality (this is why LCD monitors almost never look great unless they are set to their native resolution). Early CRT based HDTVs were also multiscan; supporting 480i, 480p and 1080i (yes all natively). Before the days of widescreen, both TVs and computer monitors had a 4:3 aspect ratio, but what many don't realize is that HDTV and widescreen computer monitors are not both 16:9, while HDTVs are 16:9 most widescreen computer monitors are 16:10 and HDTVs are usually either 1280x720 or 1920x1080 -- widescreen computer monitors are usually 1440x990 or 1680x1050, but of course there are many more 16:10 resolutions supported and some aren't really 16:10 because the pixels are not always square.
If you made it this far you're doing pretty good, because now is when things get interesting. Almost all fixed pixel HDTVs have scallers in them, which allows them to support multiple input resolutions so in addition to the normal HDTV or native resolutions they also support many computer resolutions, but unlike computer monitors they are 16:9 and as mentioned earlier they include a tuner. What is also becoming more common is for computer monitors to include component inputs (normally only on HDTVs) and support standard HDTV input resolutions, like the new Dell widescreen displays. Lucky for most you don't have to understand this to enjoy the latest displays, but If all you really wanted to know is how to connect your computer to your HDTV check out our how to.
Tuners aside there is still a distinct difference, between a computer display and a HDTV. When the PC just got started (or an Apple) you could use a TV as a monitor, but they quickly learned that interlaced tubes are terrible for reading text, so progressive scan displays became the norm, so along came VGA which has the same resolution as an SDTV; 640x480, but progressive. This obviously wasn't enough and NEC released the first multiscan display that supported multiple resolutions. (I am drastically simplifying this time line) Next came flat panel displays that were fixed pixels so they used scallers to emulate the multiscan functionality (this is why LCD monitors almost never look great unless they are set to their native resolution). Early CRT based HDTVs were also multiscan; supporting 480i, 480p and 1080i (yes all natively). Before the days of widescreen, both TVs and computer monitors had a 4:3 aspect ratio, but what many don't realize is that HDTV and widescreen computer monitors are not both 16:9, while HDTVs are 16:9 most widescreen computer monitors are 16:10 and HDTVs are usually either 1280x720 or 1920x1080 -- widescreen computer monitors are usually 1440x990 or 1680x1050, but of course there are many more 16:10 resolutions supported and some aren't really 16:10 because the pixels are not always square.
If you made it this far you're doing pretty good, because now is when things get interesting. Almost all fixed pixel HDTVs have scallers in them, which allows them to support multiple input resolutions so in addition to the normal HDTV or native resolutions they also support many computer resolutions, but unlike computer monitors they are 16:9 and as mentioned earlier they include a tuner. What is also becoming more common is for computer monitors to include component inputs (normally only on HDTVs) and support standard HDTV input resolutions, like the new Dell widescreen displays. Lucky for most you don't have to understand this to enjoy the latest displays, but If all you really wanted to know is how to connect your computer to your HDTV check out our how to.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Justin @ Jan 20th 2007 10:43AM
the vector version of the image is here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Video_Standards.svg
and works quite nicely.
Big Sam @ Jan 19th 2007 10:24PM
Don't forget that there are some 16x9 HD monitors that are meant for use as a TV, but do not include a tuner. I do not get my HD content from OTA so this works fine for me. But these will become rare (and usually cheap) since they are now required to put tuners in them. A QAM tuner would serve me more purpose than just ATSC.
John @ Jan 20th 2007 11:01AM
Yeah, My 42" is 16x9 and doesn't have a tuner, but they call it a "Monitor." It's fine for me since I have to get a set top box anyway.
Tash Kavarish @ Jan 19th 2007 11:28PM
true 1080P is great, shame so much '1080P gear' out there well, isn't 1080P at all...
- 1024x768, 1024x1024 and 1024x1080 plasmas
- most lcds sport 1366x768 if not 1280x720 yet claim to display 1080i (which given proper content and deinterlacing normally becomes true 1080p)
heck just the other day I saw a 15" LCD TV with an obvious 4:3 ratio claiming to be 'HD Ready'!
I've had a 1080P capable computer monitor (1920x1200 LCD) for years, why can't they bring the same to TV's heck, call em HD Monitors if you want just stop claiming stuff about tvs that simply aint true.
Yeah I know a few 40"+ lcd's have shown up with true 1080p, but only a few, rarely available and often almost twice the price of the not true hd sets they're supposed to replace.
Manufacturing em too expensive? here's a way to cut cost, ditch all sets under 1080p res. stop having a gazillion different models and just have like 2 models per size, with or without tv functionnality (aka tuner+speakers) so people who don't need a tuner (box from cable company replaces it) or speakers (who want's a nice pic with tin-can sound?)
Content wise it's even worse, mostly because of tv providers, low bitrates, compression, crappy user-to-use hardware, few tv channels in HD and even fewer with actual HD content and not upscaled SD stuff etc.
Anywho sorry for the long post and I hope most of it makes enough sense, it's just the tech's been possible for years, and theyve only barely started to market decent parts of it.
GhostDoggy @ Jan 20th 2007 9:27AM
Manufacturers can claim anything they want. There are no consumer protection mechanisms in place in the united States to prevent outright lies. What I hate is that websites that often work as the spin doctors for these manufacturers. BTW, Hitachi's 42" is the first to advertise "the first 1080 42" plasma", but it is 1024x1080. That would mean the pixels would have to have an aspect of 1.875 in order to get a 16:9 'HD' aspect.
Of course, lazy and ignorant consumers will buy into it even if it means half of the resolution is thrown away. Couple this with a third of the directv resolution thrown away and you are better off plugging in a VCR into that 13" black and white boob tube.
Ben @ Jan 20th 2007 11:42AM
Come on Gostdoggy you know that isn't true.
No doubt that they Hitachi you are talking about isn't true 1080p, but it still has more pixels than most 720p TVs and although DirecTV shaves their bits it is true that most people don't even notice. I know everyone is going to hate me for this, but considering their constraints it looks pretty good. (I switched to cable)
We both know this just marketing at work.
supaneko @ Jan 20th 2007 1:27PM
I was disappointed to learn that my 42" plasma didn't display a "true" widescreen picture. Rather than displaying at a widescreen resolution such as 1366x768, like many of the 50" plasmas of the same brand as my 42", it streches a 1024x768 image. Don't get me wrong though, I find the picture on my set to be absolutely stunning. But there are times when I am left wondering if I would have went with another TV or something larger, if the higher resolution would have meant a better picture.
Luke @ Jan 21st 2007 4:52AM
What seems to be missing is CIF/SIF, i.e. qSIF, SIF or 4SIF, or qCIF, CIF and 4CIF?
Luke
rothgar @ Jan 20th 2007 8:29PM
can you guys explain how a 720p monitor also displays 1080i but cannot show 1920x720?
if 720p is 1280x720 and 1080i is 1920x540 then why can't I see 1920x720 progressive?
I know 1920x720 is not 16:9 but more resolution seems to be possible but I can't understand why it would not work.
Ed @ Jan 20th 2007 8:29PM
Question, my TV is a Panasonic 32" LCD and the resolution is 1366x768p, so when I'm watching an HD DVD movie in 720p setting, am I getting 1366X768p or 1280720p?
DiRT @ Jan 21st 2007 4:58PM
"you made it this far your doing pretty good"
you're
It's short for "you are"
Austin @ Feb 28th 2007 8:11PM
??? Doing WELL sir, not good, if you are going to critique, critique properly.
James Smith @ Jan 22nd 2007 4:41AM
Quick question, when I watch a DVD on my computer and make it full screen, is my computer up scaling the image to whatever my monitors resolution is currently displaying?
davidinedmond @ Jan 29th 2007 4:11PM
Sound out your words man...... S-C-A-L-E-R. Scaler. One 'L'.